CONCERNING DR BRIAN O'LEARY

At this stage I feel pressed to address the motives of Brian O'Leary in what puzzles me as to why he would take an active role in promoting the advancement of clean and free energy devices in the recently released video titled "Free energy - the Race to Zero Point" whilst simultaneously scuttling it in having this report published in Network Review. Do we have a Jekyll and Hyde here?

And to suggest that Dr Harold Aspden of the UK and Tewari of India are in the same court and that both of them may have something of substance in the future is, to myself, (a man who has not only met Dr Aspden but has collaborated with him on the issue of new energy since 1993) a most extraordinary utterance. Not only has Dr Aspden and myself as co-inventors been granted a patent by the United Kingdom Patent Office for an over unity motor, but having been involved with Bruce DePalma for some years I was commissioned as consultant to the financiers of Bruce DePalma's 100Kw Faraday Homopolar machine, to oversee completion of construction and carry out test analyses on completion. This follows DePalma's demise here in New Zealand a year or two ago. I am very familiar with the invention and familiar also with the work of Mr Tewari, and his recent works. Dr Aspden and Mr Tewari are however poles apart. Dr Aspden is dealing with anti-pollution and clean, free energy. Tewari is not, as mercury is a vital ingredient for the operation of the machine and is a highly toxic chemical substance.

But getting back to O'Leary's motives. Is it indeed within O'Leary's sphere, or rights, to engage himself in such obscurantism as he has done with this publication? On what side of the issue does he, I wonder, sit? If he wished to progress the blood, sweat and tears of these pioneers (so listed) to a profoundly successful beginning for what will inevitably occur in the now millennium (a new, clean, free energy source for an environmentally endangered planet) wouldn't it be more salutary for him to pursue protagonism and advocacy for these people instead of going to what appears to be great lengths to publicly denigrate them. Whatever got him involved in "the Race to Zero Point" for him to turn volteface upon the star roles in that video?

I for one do not intend to stand by easily and watch these people being ostracised from their rightful place (myself included) by the prankish deed of a person who has been trained to travel in a spacecraft. O'Leary needs to reflect back on the thought that had it not been for the pioneers in the field of aviation, of whom the ideas and inventions of some appeared not only ludicrous in their day but were also "unproven" according to the time's technologies, he would not bear the insignia of 'Astronaut' today. He has the audacity to entitle his writings with the ambiguous terminology of "Miracle in the Void" whilst in the same breath tells the reading public that these pioneers are not to be taken seriously...

O'Leary has solicited the resources of an organisation who, from their published findings, exhibit their patent ignorance of the field in which they have dabbled and who are obviously, along with O'Leary himself, not qualified to parade themselves as a recognised International Evaluation or Qualifications Authority. O'Leary himself is a theorist, with no "hands-on" experience or qualification in this new dimension of energy research and development. His report is negative and biased towards the denigration of individuals whose very lives are often as not sacrificed to the field without any, let alone appropriate recompense for their efforts. There is no respect for such pioneers in his report and so he will go down in history as one whose spacetravels has failed to enlighten his sensitivities towards his fellows.