PART TWO

In this Part Two I will address some further comments made in the Lutec 1000 Business Plan as well as draw the reader's attention to some certain technical parameters that require highlighting.

With reference to 4.0 of the Business Plan wherein it states 'The Lutec 1000 is a "world first" product. Never before in the history of man, has there been a product capable of delivering free electricity.'

Now the word "product" means " a thing or substance produced by natural process or manufacture."

However, such a statement as "Never before in the history of man" is a pretty bold and grandiloquent statement for anyone to make., on any subject. For one, it arrogates to those who make it a monstrous pomposity of thought and two, it, as in this case, lends itself enormously to criticism and the opening up of quite a can of worms. To connect this statement to "has there been a product capable of delivering free electricity" is a sheer disaster and more than likely will lead to the dropping of a huge bomb in the arena of new energy research of both yesteryear and more recent times, should it be taken seriously.

I put it to the people who claim such tripe in this Business Plan (no doubt to attract investors, of course) that such a statement can only provide evidence to the knowledgeable of their gross ignorance of the history of electrical power generation, whether it be by the formation of dams, heat generators, turbines, etc. Awesome steam power, for instance, can be produced which has been utilized in production of electric power in conjunction with turbines for over the last 170 years (Farraday of England and Henry of America 1832). To name but a few of the pioneers in this field of electrical power generation, there is -

Faraday, Henry, Nikola Tesla, Schauberger, Sir James Watt, Lord Kelvin, Edwin Grey, Dr. Harold Aspden, Bedinni, etc. There are many more too numerous to name. Suffice here to say that these people above, and the many more like them, have all "produced" machines and devices that have "worked" and still do. The fact that many of their devices did not come to the world market, as they should have, is a result of either lack of credence from the general public and politicians of the day, suppression or lack of money, not of being "world firsts".

I refer now to reference 7.0 of the Business Plan titled 'Competitive Analysis.' In reading all the "put downs" so neatly arranged therein which include Solar, Turbines, Hybrid, Petro and Diesel, Coal, Nuclear, Hydro, Bio-mass, zero point, hydrogen - and wherein they list five possible threats to them, I wonder just how well they have researched all these alternatives they denigrate. They pepper their statements here in such terms as 'the blind leading the blind', 'theorists', 'mavericks', 'lunatic fringe;, 'fanciful ideas, opinions and guesses' 'the upstart industry'. In one paragraph they state - "When there is only an often repeated theory based on guess work, reported on and discussed long enough, it eventually becomes 'fact' in some people's minds, maybe even in the minds of the original proponents." This paragraph represents a double-edged sword - in some cases this is true, in others it is not. Here, of course, it is hoped they are talking about "theories" and/or "theorists" who do not conduct pragmatic experimentation and testing on a "hands-on" basis within a laboratory situation. Not a good idea to place such statements in a "Business Plan" I would think. I also wonder if they know how dangerous it is to denigrate the rest of the world's efforts in their "Business Plan" in order to place their own device on a pedestal. Not at all wise. Nor justifiable.